Benefits of Training Management System

Here’s what a Training Management System can, and should, do for you:

  • Learning Management System makes it very easy for trainers to update existing training content or add new content in a short time
  • Comply and Meet essential regulatory requirements and other best practices more easily
  • Enhance managers and employees ability to achieve required results, not just complete the training
  • Measure the reduction in operational expenses, travel time and on-site visits
  • Reduce the time for needed for creating, updating, printing and shipping of learning course manuals and documentation
  • Dramatically reduce the cost of software for managing and creating training courses
  • Improve the administration of your learning programs
  • Increase your ability to manage and deploy e-learning to your employees across any location
  • Consolidates training information to improve efficiency, improved facilities coordination and cost utilization
  • Improve personnel performance by enabling you to manage admiration and human resources more effectively
  • Implement more and more effective skills and competency training management programs
  • Reduce training costs
  • Increase the number of training courses that you can deliver for less money
  • Training Course materials on an effectively deployed Learning Management System (LMS) can be accessed by employees across geographies, without affecting the quality or consistency of training
  • These training systems allow the creation, personalization, and download of detailed training reports outlining the progress of the learners, departmental groups, completion of work, time taken to complete the task, etc. which allows easy evaluation of their progress either as an individual or a group

A modern Learning Management System, like AmpleLogic LMS, can support your organizations as it grows, and give you the flexibility to add the latest features and functionality to support your training and learning programs

Are you ready to invest in a new Learning Management System or LMS? Contact us today to find out more or schedule a demo.

Schedule a Free Consultation
Request a Demo
Articles

See More Articles

Root Cause Analysis with example for “5” Why technique

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a method that is used to address a problem or non-conformance in the quality process to get to the “root cause” (actual cause of origin) of the non-conformity. RCA helps to correct or eliminate the cause and prevent the problem from recurring (preventive action). Root cause analyses is aimed at improving products or processes quality and must an in systematic ways to be effective. Different Methods of doing Root Cause Analysis: Root Cause Analysis Methodology   Fish bone technique The “5” Why’s technique. Barrier Analysis Change Analysis Casual Factor tree analysis Failure mode and effects analysis Pareto analysis Advantages: To identify non-conformity and the causes, so that permanent solution can be found. To develop a logical approach of problem-solving, using data that already exists in QMS (Quality Management System) To identify current and also future needs for organizational quality improvement. To establish a repeatable systematic step by step processes, in which one process can confirm the results of another with deep analysis. Challenges: Not having the ability to understand the problem and therefore not defining it correctly. Not considering all possible failure modes. Not able to identify all root causes. No proper defined solution for the non-conformity. The “5” Why technique causes mapping Non-conformity identified: Decrease in the viscosity of Vitamin D3 syrup. The “5” why technique can be expanded to 15 why or 150 why the deeper you go the more thorough analyzing takes place and reveals better solutions Contact us for more information about the AmpleLogic Quality Systems Offerings.   Schedule a Free Consultation Request a Demo First NameLast NameCompany NameEmailPhone NumberDesignationCountrySelect CountryAfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelauBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBonaire, Saint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the Congo (Kinshasa)DenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyIvory CoastJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKosovoKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacao S.A.R., ChinaMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth KoreaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalestinian TerritoryPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarRepublic of the Congo (Brazzaville)ReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthélemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (Dutch part)Saint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia/Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom (UK)United States (US)United States (US) Minor Outlying IslandsUnited States (US) Virgin IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVaticanVenezuelaVietnamWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweWhere you heard about us?– Select –Google SearchLinkedInReferralWord of MouthLinkedIn AdsMediumRequirementGet in touch

Learn more

Why is embracing the Document Management System still intimidating?

DMS in a layperson perception A thorough-cum-simpler explanation of Document Management System will make us understand about the efficacy of this digital trend. With the name “Electronic Document Management System”, we get an overall idea that the system is supposedly managing the documentation process. Now, this process is the common one being done in every organization, we all know. Here the point comes is : How are these documentation things being processed or managed in various industries these days? Collecting all the needed data or information of a company and putting them down in a specific file or document is something that we know very well, which has been done manually for ages. But with trending technological inventions like IoT, AI, Cyber Security, etc., in the ongoing digital world, we must step up to a more effort-less mode of documentation. So, with this, we came up with eDMS.  Replacing manual documentation work to automated-cum-electronic documentation, Electronic Document Management System has brought a different level of changes in contemporary pharma as well as life sciences companies. A quick peek of digitalization using Electronic Document Management Software (eDMS) While DMS has given us chances to ease our pain with an effective modification in documentation tasks, FDA’s 21 CFR part 11 has confirmed that electronic documents along with the records and signatures can surely be considered as the legitimate ones. Hence, it has confirmed that there will be no difference between paper signature and e-signature, rather the later one will be more considerable. Let’s have a quick walk through the benefits we have gained with Electronic Document Management System in contemporary pharma companies. Easy creation, management, and storage of all the crucial data and information of the company is possible with DMS. On incorrect data feeding, mismatch of information, missing data, you will get a reminder or notification which is not possible in manual management. All the data is stored in a specific and common cloud, which is accessible to everyone from everywhere. A smooth documentation now ensures a streamline workflow and saves a lot of time and resources which can be used in other areas of growth. Complete replacement of paperworks into paperless documentation becomes easy with eDMS. Having thorough data on drugs, research, new compliances, regulations require error-free documentation and with Pharmaceutical Document Management Solution this task can be managed easily. Storage of all the digital documents under a common cloud is much safer than keeping manual data in the form of documents stored in some physical storage. Accessible cloud storage documentation allows you to access the data whenever and wherever required, whereas in manual management there is some chance of missing out on important data. An organized documentation not only takes care of the data storage but also ensures a smooth flow of additional departments like SOP Management, manufacturing, operation, quality planning, etc. Terrorizing reasons restricting full-fledged eDMS inculcation Despite a lot of benefits, there are many companies who are reconsidering their decisions of incorporating Document Management Systems into their business. Every innovation comes with certain pros and cons. When we have already understood several benefits of the automatic documentation process, let’s explore the risky or stressed side or probable challenges of this digital trend. Data being vulnerable: With documentation being staged on digital platforms, it is extremely necessary to keep an eye on the security side. When crucial data is stored in the cloud then there comes a major terror of data being vulnerable and being attacked by malicious cyber frauds. Hence, it is required to maintain utmost cybersecurity ensuring the documentation is safe in the cloud kept away from cyber thefts. Doubt on successful implementation: There are so many growing features of Electronic Document Management and Tracking Software for Lifesciences industries, but we need to explore all those specifications accurately. Adding on a digital trend to a business could sound fun, but the real game starts when you implement the software effectively. This can be done with active seminars, group discussions, and taking feedback from employees (who are using it) on document management solution. Fear of smooth integration: The DMS must come up with appropriate integration of all relevant departments, then only we can assure its potential usage. Hence integration of DMS with other in-house applications must be done properly to make the system work automatically and independently. Staying inconsistent in usage: To replace paperworks with digital paperless ones, giving employees detailed training on Pharmaceutical Document Management and Tracking Software is essential. Hence, keeping the usage of DMS consistent becomes a tough task if the users are not well-trained. So, the prior task is to train employees about the usage of the platform and bring consistency in keeping the system in work consistently. Realising the probable challenges as well as conquered benefits of Document Management Solution we can easily understand how to proceed with this amazing transformation from loads of paper-based documents to hassle-free paperless one-stop-data centres. AmpleLogic’s best DMS software is assisting several pharma as well as other businesses to successfully implement this amazing digital tweak to their work processes making lives easier. Talk to our team to enroll for a free demo on Electronic Document Management System. Schedule a Free Consultation Request a Demo First NameLast NameCompany NameEmailPhone NumberDesignationCountrySelect CountryAfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelauBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBonaire, Saint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the Congo (Kinshasa)DenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyIvory CoastJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKosovoKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacao S.A.R., ChinaMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth KoreaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalestinian TerritoryPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarRepublic of the Congo (Brazzaville)ReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthélemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (Dutch part)Saint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia/Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom (UK)United States (US)United States (US) Minor Outlying IslandsUnited States (US) Virgin IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVaticanVenezuelaVietnamWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweWhere you heard about us?– Select –Google

Learn more

GAMP 5 Categories, V Model and 21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11

What is GAMP 5? Good Automated Manufacturing Practice, Founded in 1991. International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE) sets the guidelines for manufacturers and the current Version is GAMP 5. GAMP describes a set of principles and procedures that help ensure that pharmaceutical Software (Like QMS Software, LMS software, DMS software etc.) has required quality. Computer system validation (CSV) following GAMP guidelines require users and suppliers to work together so that responsibilities regarding the validation process are understood. For users: GAMP provides a documented assurance that a system is appropriate for the intended use before it goes “live.” Suppliers can use GAMP to test for avoidable defects in the supplied system to ensure quality products are produced. Why GAMP 5? Facilitates the interpretation of regulatory requirements. Establishes a common language and terminology. Promotes a system life cycle approach based on good practice. Clarifies roles and responsibilities. Focus attention on those computerized systems with the most impact on patient safety, product quality, and data integrity Avoid duplication of activities There are five key concepts to GAMP 5: Product and Process Understanding Lifecycle approach within QMS Scalable Lifecycle Activities Science Based Quality Risk Management Leveraging Supplier Involvement GAMP 5 Categories Difference between Category 4 and Category 5 in GAMP 5 Configuration and customization of software are terms that are poorly defined in the validation world and frequently used interchangeably, especially in a vendor’s marketing literature. It is important to understand the difference between these two terms as they mean entirely different things and consequently can have a dramatic impact on the amount of validation work that you could undertake. Configuration: The modification of the function of a software product to meet the business process or user requirements using tools supplied by the supplier. These tools can include the input of user-defined text strings for drop-down menus, turning software functions on or off, graphical dragging and dropping of information elements, and creation of specific reports using the standard functionality of the package. Customization: The writing of software modules, scripts, procedures, or applications to meet business requirements. This can be achieved using an external programming language (such as C++ or .NET or PL*SQL for database procedures), macro instructions, or an internal scripting language specific for a commercial application. Depending on the user requirements the same implementation can be Category 4 or 5 What is SDLC Model?  What model GAMP 5 Suggests? The software development life cycle (SDLC) is a framework defining tasks performed at each step in the software development process. SDLC is a structure followed by a development team within the software organization. It consists of a detailed plan describing how to develop, maintain and replace specific software. The life cycle defines a methodology to deliver the quality of software and the overall development process. What is 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11? 21 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 11 has defined by the US FDA regulations that set forth the criteria applies to electronic records and electronic signatures that persons create, modify, maintain, archive, retrieve, or transmit under any records or signature requirement set forth in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act, or any FDA regulation Annex 11 is part of the European GMP Guidelines and defines the terms of reference for computerized systems software used by organizations in the pharmaceutical industry. Queries? Any relation between GAMP 5 or v Model with 21 CFR Part 11? Both are the set of guidelines which are used to validate a computer-based software used in pharma manufacturing companies. The guidelines are predefined, and software should comply with the guidelines. GAMP talks about “the How” and the 21 CFR talks “the What” during the Validation of computer-based software for Pharma companies. GAMP is a methodology and 21 CFR are a regulation 21 CFR Part 11 is US FDA and Annex 11 is EU guidelines. A Company is delivering software to the banking sector they never heard of part 11 but when the Pharma customer wants them to map Part 11 requirements will the solution comply with them? Even if a company is delivering software to the banking sector, the solution will generally comply with part 11 requirements. In banking software’s there may not be the reference of Part 11, but the requirements of Part 11 will be met by the banking software’s A software company is following SDLC models from the past 8 years. For the first time, they are delivering a pharma software solution. When the customer team comes for an audit what software development methodologies they need to demonstrate to win the auditor. Whenever there is an audit of the customer need to explain the detailed procedure followed to develop software right from the beginning of User requirement gathering to the maintenance and support. Even if the company does not know the standard guidelines, we can map the existing followed procedure with the guidelines and standards to comply with client requirements. The company which comes to audit have a set of guidelines or criteria which the supplier should comply to pass the audit. The pharma companies investigate whether the software follows GAMP, or Part 11 or EU annexure 11. To win the auditor the company must have followed an SDLC Methodology with Proper Reviews and Tracking. A software company doesn’t want to follow the V model, still wanted to deliver pharma software (Quality Management Software, Document Management System, ANDA and DMF tracker etc.). Will this be acceptable to Pharma Company? Acceptable if Software Company follows standard SDLC models and follows the Standards for developing and managing the code. Explore Our GMP Solutions eQMS DMS LMS RIMS QC Planning eLogbook LIMS APQR Asset Management EMS eBMR UMS View All Solutions Schedule a Free Consultation Request a Demo First NameLast NameCompany NameEmailPhone NumberDesignationCountrySelect CountryAfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelauBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBonaire, Saint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the Congo (Kinshasa)DenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard

Learn more